The big guns
– Apple, Samsung and Google – are dominating the mobile payments news cycle now
that their respective ‘Pay’ platforms threaten to disintermediate the world’s
banks.
They won’t have it all their own way, though; banks are responding with their own platforms. But is it too little, too late?
They won’t have it all their own way, though; banks are responding with their own platforms. But is it too little, too late?
The current state of ‘Pay’
Apple Pay
registered some impressive figures when it launched in the US in 2014. It
seems, though, that adoption has slowed, as more devices go unregistered and
the initial hype dies down. An ongoing survey conducted by Infoscout shows the number of eligible Apple Pay users who
tried the service dropped
from 15.1 percent in March to 13.1 percent in June. The victory, though, is
the impact on the market. Apple has done an exceptional job in bringing mobile
contactless payments into the mainstream, paving the way for Samsung, Google
and the banks.
Samsung Pay
has been live in Korea since late August and has picked up around 500,000
users. This statistic should grow following launch in the US at the end of
September and not least because the platform can make payments with both
contactless and mag stripe terminals. On top of this, Google launched Android
Pay on 10th September. We’re yet to see any adoption figures here but the
land-grab is certainly going to be interesting. Indeed, the advertising war has
already commenced!
Separately,
Google has also updated
its wallet app to offer peer-to-peer payments and wallet-to-bank transfers.
Android and iOS users can now send money to anyone in the US with an email
address, even if they do not use the app themselves. With bill splitting,
activity notifications and the ability to set up recurring transfers thrown
into the mix, it is clear to see that the internet giants are intent on taking
bank disintermediation even further.
Game over? Don’t bank on it.
But the
banks are not walking quietly into the night; September has seen a spate of
activity from the payments industry’s more traditional quarters. First up,
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) became
the first financial institution in North America to launch a host card
emulation (HCE) mobile payment service, following a pilot in December 2014. On
top of this, the bank also became the
first to have a patent confirmed for its ‘Secure Cloud payment and security
technology’. Across the pond in the UK, Barclaycard has used
HCE to expand the functionality of its Android mobile application to enable
near field communication (NFC) mobile payments for its customers.
And more are
coming. Earlier this month, ING in the Netherlands begun
testing a HCE-based service which will be made available to 5,000 of the
bank’s customers who have an Android smartphone running KitKat 4.4 and above.
While the
internet giants have the upper hand, the war is far from over. Few would argue
that bank disintermediation is underway and most accept that it is likely to
accelerate. What’s more, the ultimate price for banks may well be bigger than
they realise today. Once visibility and control over customer relationships is
relinquished, so too are all other revenue opportunities that support the traditional
banking model. For banks’ new competitors, particularly retailers,
payments and other traditional banking facilities are more an inconvenience
than they are business opportunities; their goal is to remove all points of
‘friction’ from the consumer’s mobile experience. To this end, they don’t just
want to steal the market, they want it to disappear entirely.
It is
encouraging therefore to see the banks reclaiming ground with their own
solutions. Apple, Google and Samsung have each failed in their bids to take
control of the market. For the most part, banks still believe that they are the
trusted partners of consumer finance. It is now down to the each
individual bank to decide whether it retains, recedes or expands its position
in this market through partnerships, proprietary solutions or a combination of
the two.
No comments:
Post a Comment